I believe one of the most distinct and interesting transitions in art came between the 19th and 20th centuries, at which a major change in metropolitan life occurred. During the 1800′s, European cities were not-so-densely packed locations for the upper bourgeois class. While the state of cities at this time can be researched and read about in a history book, I think it’s the works of art that most clearly represent both the physical and psychological state of the city at this time.
The 19th Century
The work work below by Caillebotte shows the city as a place composed of clear individuals. Each person is both distinct and isolated from other groups, which is enforced by the fact that they all carry umbrellas that define their own space in the painting. These people do not interact with each other, but instead are reserved to themselves and maintain their calm composure. Caillebotte even further asserts this kind of isolation by not having any of his painted character make eye contact with the viewer, suggesting that the viewer is just another similar person walking on the street. The city appears spacious, quiet, and non-stressful. However, this perception of the city would be entirely reversed due to forces at the beginning of the 20th century that drastically changed metropolitan life.
Gustav Caillebotte, Paris Street; Rainy Day, 1877

The 20th Century
At the turn of the century and with the growth of industry, suddenly cities saw a major change in both size and atmosphere. The integration of lower classes and overpopulation brought an eclectic mix of people, including workers and prostitutes. Artist Ernst Kirchner illustrates this with his perception of the mass as an amorphous collection of people, bleeding into each other and no longer distinguishable as individuals (See painting below). Compared to Caillebotte’s use of softer, quieter colors, Kirchner uses an eccentric color palate to accentuate the literal and psychological “noise” of the city. The women are sexualized through curvature and stare straight at the viewer, inviting him into the chaotic scene. However, it is hard to know where to focus as the eye is continually drawn from one point to another, skimming the overwhelming visual feed of the painting.
Ernst Kirchner, Street, Dresden, 1908

In Conclusion
While it may seem easiest to pick up a book that summarizes the history and development and cities, sometimes the easiest way to understand changes in history through art. For each art movement there is a corresponding time period that can not only show the influence for the works, but best illustrate the state of life at the time. These two paintings not only show that there was a change between the 19th and 20th century, but the gravity it had on one’s perception of the city and the atmosphere it created.
// C
Related articles:
- Paul Cezanne Paints the Human Body and Changes the Art Game (artsnapper.com)
- Art Attack: Mr Manet ❤ (thecharlottesociety.wordpress.com)
- The artist and the machine (michaelnielsen.org)
- List of Art Movements (artsnapper.com)
- List of Art Museums in Chicago (artsnapper.com)
Share With Your Friends:
You May Also Like:
- Art History Happening Today
- Jaroslaw Jasnikowski’s Marvelous Surreal World – History and the Future
- Van Gogh Up Close Exhibit – Philadelphia Museum of Art
- Paul Cezanne Paints the Human Body and Changes the Art Game
- JR Continues to Change the World and Turn it INSIDE OUT (Video)
Connect With Us
Trending Posts
Monday Muse: Instagram Still Young but it Has MatuTwo years ago today, the first Instagram photo was taken (See below). Since then…
How Do You Begin the Art Appreciation Process? JusAs someone who entered the art game a little late in life, my belief that art sh…
Chain Sculptures by Seo Young Deok (Video)After seeing the chain sculptures created by Korean artist Seo Young Deok, you w…
Author Spotlight
Featured Post
Monday Muse: Instagram Still Young but it Has MatuTwo years ago today, the first Instagram photo was taken (Se…
